- No products in the cart.
The National Construction Code
Simpler Rules, Better Buildings
Australia’s National Construction Code has grown far beyond its original purpose. What was once a practical guide to ensure safe, compliant building has become an unwieldy rulebook packed with best‑practice aspirations, overlapping requirements and layers of red tape. The result is slower delivery, higher costs, and a system that’s increasingly difficult to use in practice—right when Australia needs more homes, built more efficiently, than ever before.
Why streamline the Code?
Clarity
The NCC has shifted from setting minimum standards to imposing best‑practice benchmarks, creating unnecessary complexity and poor integration. A clearer, tightly focused Code would restore its core purpose: ensuring compliant design and construction within the boundaries of building control.
Productivity
Ambitious additions—particularly around accessibility and sustainability—have expanded the Code’s remit and added hundreds of pages of regulation. Volume Two alone has ballooned from 93 pages in 1993 to 889 pages today. This regulatory creep slows down builders, reduces productivity, and ultimately drives up the cost of every new home.
Affordability
With the Productivity Commission estimating regulatory burdens at $47.5 billion per year—around $320,000 per new house—streamlining the NCC is essential to boosting supply. Australia cannot meet its housing targets or restore the dream of home ownership without removing unnecessary barriers and enabling the private sector to build more homes, faster.